TEXAS BLOGGERS: JOIN THE NEW TEXAS REVOLUTION!
Saturday, January 14, 2006
Resources vs. Appearances
One of Digby's guest bloggers is so eloquent in this piece that I don't want to spoil it. Just read it.
What I will add is this: I sense that liberals are divided in this country between those who have had the rude awakening over the course of Bush's presidency that none of the progress that Progressivism won during the last century is in any sense permanent, secure or settled--and those who believe that we have forever secured victory in the battles we have already won and so the stakes just aren't as high as the more finnicky folks would think. Whether we like it or not--from the attack on Social Security to the torture of prisoners to the out-in-the-open equivocation of those currently running our country, etc etc--most of the lessons of the Twentieth Century are simply up for grabs.
For God's sake (no pun intended), we are debating evolution again.
And that brings me to say that liberals may need to become radicals again--not in the "violent revolution" way that the word is popularly received, but in the sense that they have to come back to their fundamentals--their roots (hence radical)--before they can make further "progress". We have to fight about the distribution of resources again--because it is not settled. We have to fight for racial justice again, not simply politeness. All the cultural sensitivity in the world will not bring back New Orleans. It is not settled. We have to fight for human rights again. Shockingly, it is not settled.
We have made no irreversable progress. I recognize that. I hope the Senate Democrats who are poised to let Samuel Alito onto the Supreme Court with barely any opposition recognize it, too.
What I will add is this: I sense that liberals are divided in this country between those who have had the rude awakening over the course of Bush's presidency that none of the progress that Progressivism won during the last century is in any sense permanent, secure or settled--and those who believe that we have forever secured victory in the battles we have already won and so the stakes just aren't as high as the more finnicky folks would think. Whether we like it or not--from the attack on Social Security to the torture of prisoners to the out-in-the-open equivocation of those currently running our country, etc etc--most of the lessons of the Twentieth Century are simply up for grabs.
For God's sake (no pun intended), we are debating evolution again.
And that brings me to say that liberals may need to become radicals again--not in the "violent revolution" way that the word is popularly received, but in the sense that they have to come back to their fundamentals--their roots (hence radical)--before they can make further "progress". We have to fight about the distribution of resources again--because it is not settled. We have to fight for racial justice again, not simply politeness. All the cultural sensitivity in the world will not bring back New Orleans. It is not settled. We have to fight for human rights again. Shockingly, it is not settled.
We have made no irreversable progress. I recognize that. I hope the Senate Democrats who are poised to let Samuel Alito onto the Supreme Court with barely any opposition recognize it, too.
